Artwork

Contenu fourni par Danny Lennon. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Danny Lennon ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Application Podcast
Mettez-vous hors ligne avec l'application Player FM !

#528: Is Unprocessed Red Meat Problematic for Our Health?

1:17:00
 
Partager
 

Manage episode 427989745 series 2461191
Contenu fourni par Danny Lennon. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Danny Lennon ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

The consumption of red meat, specifically the distinction between unprocessed and processed varieties, has been a subject of considerable debate in nutritional science and public health. There is a fair amount of confusion and lack of clarity surrounding this issue.

While the harmful effects of processed meat are well-documented and less controversial, the evidence concerning unprocessed red meat is less consistent. This inconsistency often leads to a gray area in scientific discussions and public perception. In examining unprocessed red meat, we encounter a spectrum of claims, including minimal evidence of harm, context of overall diet and mechanistic concerns.

Epidemiological evidence shows varied health outcomes related to red meat consumption across different populations. These variations underline the importance of defining and measuring “high” and “low” intake levels accurately in research.

The challenges in nutrition research, including methodological flaws in meta-analyses and the rapid dissemination of simplified study results, can impact public health recommendations. Misinterpretations can arise from comparisons within narrow intake ranges or from studies failing to specify absolute intake levels.

This podcast episode’s goal is to clarify existing evidence, acknowledge areas needing further research, and explore why this topic is significant in the broader context of nutrition science, aiming to equip healthcare professionals with the knowledge needed to make nuanced and effective dietary recommendations.

Links:

Timestamps
  • 01:00 Introduction to the issue
  • 03:16 Processed vs. unprocessed red meat
  • 05:54 Health guidelines and recommendations
  • 06:56 Epidemiological evidence and dose thresholds
  • 09:55 Biological mechanisms and plausibility
  • 21:00 Criticisms and misinterpretations in research
  • 40:42 Substitution analyses and dietary patterns
  • 46:37 Mendelian randomization and genetic studies
  • 56:31 Effect modifiers and confounders
  • 01:13:18 Key Ideas Segment (Premium-only)
  continue reading

545 episodes

Artwork
iconPartager
 
Manage episode 427989745 series 2461191
Contenu fourni par Danny Lennon. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Danny Lennon ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

The consumption of red meat, specifically the distinction between unprocessed and processed varieties, has been a subject of considerable debate in nutritional science and public health. There is a fair amount of confusion and lack of clarity surrounding this issue.

While the harmful effects of processed meat are well-documented and less controversial, the evidence concerning unprocessed red meat is less consistent. This inconsistency often leads to a gray area in scientific discussions and public perception. In examining unprocessed red meat, we encounter a spectrum of claims, including minimal evidence of harm, context of overall diet and mechanistic concerns.

Epidemiological evidence shows varied health outcomes related to red meat consumption across different populations. These variations underline the importance of defining and measuring “high” and “low” intake levels accurately in research.

The challenges in nutrition research, including methodological flaws in meta-analyses and the rapid dissemination of simplified study results, can impact public health recommendations. Misinterpretations can arise from comparisons within narrow intake ranges or from studies failing to specify absolute intake levels.

This podcast episode’s goal is to clarify existing evidence, acknowledge areas needing further research, and explore why this topic is significant in the broader context of nutrition science, aiming to equip healthcare professionals with the knowledge needed to make nuanced and effective dietary recommendations.

Links:

Timestamps
  • 01:00 Introduction to the issue
  • 03:16 Processed vs. unprocessed red meat
  • 05:54 Health guidelines and recommendations
  • 06:56 Epidemiological evidence and dose thresholds
  • 09:55 Biological mechanisms and plausibility
  • 21:00 Criticisms and misinterpretations in research
  • 40:42 Substitution analyses and dietary patterns
  • 46:37 Mendelian randomization and genetic studies
  • 56:31 Effect modifiers and confounders
  • 01:13:18 Key Ideas Segment (Premium-only)
  continue reading

545 episodes

Semua episode

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenue sur Lecteur FM!

Lecteur FM recherche sur Internet des podcasts de haute qualité que vous pourrez apprécier dès maintenant. C'est la meilleure application de podcast et fonctionne sur Android, iPhone et le Web. Inscrivez-vous pour synchroniser les abonnements sur tous les appareils.

 

Guide de référence rapide