Artwork

Contenu fourni par Paul Weber. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Paul Weber ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Application Podcast
Mettez-vous hors ligne avec l'application Player FM !

064 Why I Don't Program Odd Objects

11:37
 
Partager
 

Manage episode 419745444 series 3498945
Contenu fourni par Paul Weber. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Paul Weber ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

Send us a text

Bottom line – SPECIFICITY

Less specificity than simple barbell training

When you have multiple training priorities (when you’re trying to improve in multiple disciplines simultaneously) then specificity becomes even more important.

For a CrossFitter, the training effort you can give to any one discipline is less than it would be if you were just a weightlifter, just a gymnast or just an endurance athlete.

When you have a scarcity of training effort, you need to be even more selective how you spend it.

You want that training effort to produce the highest possible performance improvement. That is usually the thing that is the most specific.

Preparedness

Preparedness needs to be brought up

e.g. bending with lumbar flexion

We have to consider preparedness for that position, knowing that loaded lumbar flexion is more risky than bending with a neutral or extended lumbar.

It’s not that you can’t do it or should never do it, you just have to build preparedness before you go take a maximal stone for a ride.

Compatibility

High axial loading and fatigue – means odd object strength training is incompatible with other high axial fatigue movements, like squat and deadlift, which are more specific to CrossFit.

If you challenge yourself in this style of training, it must displace some training effort that you would otherwise put to barbell squatting and deadlifting.

I would rather have my athletes doing the thing that is most specific. Especially if it’s high fatigue.

Summary

I prefer standard barbell strength training to odd object strength training.

Reason #1 Specificity

Reason #2 Preparedness – takes time to prepare for novel positions

Reason #3 Compatibility – high fatigue, axial loading, so displaces training effort you could be putting into the barbell

  continue reading

104 episodes

Artwork
iconPartager
 
Manage episode 419745444 series 3498945
Contenu fourni par Paul Weber. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Paul Weber ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

Send us a text

Bottom line – SPECIFICITY

Less specificity than simple barbell training

When you have multiple training priorities (when you’re trying to improve in multiple disciplines simultaneously) then specificity becomes even more important.

For a CrossFitter, the training effort you can give to any one discipline is less than it would be if you were just a weightlifter, just a gymnast or just an endurance athlete.

When you have a scarcity of training effort, you need to be even more selective how you spend it.

You want that training effort to produce the highest possible performance improvement. That is usually the thing that is the most specific.

Preparedness

Preparedness needs to be brought up

e.g. bending with lumbar flexion

We have to consider preparedness for that position, knowing that loaded lumbar flexion is more risky than bending with a neutral or extended lumbar.

It’s not that you can’t do it or should never do it, you just have to build preparedness before you go take a maximal stone for a ride.

Compatibility

High axial loading and fatigue – means odd object strength training is incompatible with other high axial fatigue movements, like squat and deadlift, which are more specific to CrossFit.

If you challenge yourself in this style of training, it must displace some training effort that you would otherwise put to barbell squatting and deadlifting.

I would rather have my athletes doing the thing that is most specific. Especially if it’s high fatigue.

Summary

I prefer standard barbell strength training to odd object strength training.

Reason #1 Specificity

Reason #2 Preparedness – takes time to prepare for novel positions

Reason #3 Compatibility – high fatigue, axial loading, so displaces training effort you could be putting into the barbell

  continue reading

104 episodes

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenue sur Lecteur FM!

Lecteur FM recherche sur Internet des podcasts de haute qualité que vous pourrez apprécier dès maintenant. C'est la meilleure application de podcast et fonctionne sur Android, iPhone et le Web. Inscrivez-vous pour synchroniser les abonnements sur tous les appareils.

 

Guide de référence rapide

Écoutez cette émission pendant que vous explorez
Lire