))
Algorithm Integrity Matters: for Financial Services leaders, to enhance fairness and accuracy in data processing
«
»
Article 2. Choice vs obligation: motivation shapes the effectiveness of your review
Manage episode 436135456 series 3594717
Contenu fourni par Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Risk Insights: Yusuf Moolla ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Spoken (by a human) version of this article.
The motivation(s) for commissioning a review can determine how effective it will be.
Consider a personal health check-up:
- Sometimes we undergo medical check-ups because we don’t have a choice. We need to - for example for workplace requirements or for insurance.
- At other times, we choose to undergo such check-ups. We want to maintain optimal health and catch any potential issues early.
Often, our approach differs depending on whether we are forced to, or choose to.
The motivations – need vs want – can define how we prioritise them, what our interactions with the medical professional are and how we view the results.
Our engagement and satisfaction levels are generally higher when we choose (than when we are forced).
The same holds for reviews and audits.
https://riskinsights.com.au/blog/need-vs-want-an-audit
About this podcast
A podcast for Financial Services leaders, where we discuss fairness and accuracy in the use of data, algorithms, and AI.
Hosted by Yusuf Moolla.
Produced by Risk Insights (riskinsights.com.au).
19 episodes
Partager
