Artwork

Contenu fourni par Eleonora Voltolina. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Eleonora Voltolina ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Application Podcast
Mettez-vous hors ligne avec l'application Player FM !

When gender discrimination is blessed by the Constitutions: The Why Wait Agenda meets Carla Bassu

37:14
 
Partager
 

Manage episode 365291247 series 3399333
Contenu fourni par Eleonora Voltolina. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Eleonora Voltolina ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

What have Constitutions got to do with people’s decision to have babies or not? Well, for example, the Italian constitution has an article that states: «Working conditions shall allow women to fulfil their essential role in the family», placing working women in a subordinate position to working men, who are free to work without being forced to fulfil any «essential role». And an unequal household division of labour and attitudes about egalitarian roles can influence the timing of first births, according to the paper “Why do people postpone parenthood?” by professor Melinda Mills (also a guest of our podcast, twice!) amongst others.
«Working conditions shall allow women to fulfil their essential role in the family», then. It wasn’t all that shocking seventy years ago, when the Italian Constitution was written. But it's quite different now.
The guest of this episode is Carla Bassu, one of the youngest full professors of Comparative Public Law in Italy, and an ambassador for egalitarian roles. For years she fought – and recently won – a major battle: the one to empower both parents to give their surname to their children in Italy.
«We need to consider the contest [our Constitution] has been formulated in» professor Bassu says, «It reflects the historical and cultural background: in 1948, when our Constitution came into effect, most people found it hard to recognise a position for women away from domestic work». So, being an historical document as all Constitutions are, the Italian Constitution simply reflects the spirit of the time.
But a lot can be done now, Bassu explains, «by interpretation» of the said Constitution, and «through education» of the younger generations towards gender equality and equal parenting. Because, even if it's probably a bit of a stretch to blame the Italian Constitution for the fertility gap – the imbalance between how many children people would like to have and how many children they actually end up having – it's fair to say that it certainly hasn’t helped.

  continue reading

8 episodes

Artwork
iconPartager
 
Manage episode 365291247 series 3399333
Contenu fourni par Eleonora Voltolina. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Eleonora Voltolina ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

What have Constitutions got to do with people’s decision to have babies or not? Well, for example, the Italian constitution has an article that states: «Working conditions shall allow women to fulfil their essential role in the family», placing working women in a subordinate position to working men, who are free to work without being forced to fulfil any «essential role». And an unequal household division of labour and attitudes about egalitarian roles can influence the timing of first births, according to the paper “Why do people postpone parenthood?” by professor Melinda Mills (also a guest of our podcast, twice!) amongst others.
«Working conditions shall allow women to fulfil their essential role in the family», then. It wasn’t all that shocking seventy years ago, when the Italian Constitution was written. But it's quite different now.
The guest of this episode is Carla Bassu, one of the youngest full professors of Comparative Public Law in Italy, and an ambassador for egalitarian roles. For years she fought – and recently won – a major battle: the one to empower both parents to give their surname to their children in Italy.
«We need to consider the contest [our Constitution] has been formulated in» professor Bassu says, «It reflects the historical and cultural background: in 1948, when our Constitution came into effect, most people found it hard to recognise a position for women away from domestic work». So, being an historical document as all Constitutions are, the Italian Constitution simply reflects the spirit of the time.
But a lot can be done now, Bassu explains, «by interpretation» of the said Constitution, and «through education» of the younger generations towards gender equality and equal parenting. Because, even if it's probably a bit of a stretch to blame the Italian Constitution for the fertility gap – the imbalance between how many children people would like to have and how many children they actually end up having – it's fair to say that it certainly hasn’t helped.

  continue reading

8 episodes

Alle episoder

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenue sur Lecteur FM!

Lecteur FM recherche sur Internet des podcasts de haute qualité que vous pourrez apprécier dès maintenant. C'est la meilleure application de podcast et fonctionne sur Android, iPhone et le Web. Inscrivez-vous pour synchroniser les abonnements sur tous les appareils.

 

Guide de référence rapide