))
Appeal Your Arbitrator?
Manage episode 376841580 series 3344448
Contenu fourni par Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Tim Kowal & Jeff Lewis, Tim Kowal, and Jeff Lewis ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
We discuss some interesting recent cases out of the California Court of Appeal:
- Arbitration clauses may include an agreement to make the award reviewable on appeal. We discuss a recent case that shows how.
- Can a judge just stay a money judgment?
- What to do if the appellate court issues a tentative opinion.
- When an amended order suspends the right to appeal from the original order.
Then we discuss the “Eisenberg rule,” and a survey that explains why lawyers still use legalese.
Appellate Specialist Jeff Lewis' biography, LinkedIn profile, and Twitter feed.
Appellate Specialist Tim Kowal's biography, LinkedIn profile, Twitter feed, and YouTube page.
Sign up for Not To Be Published, Tim Kowal’s weekly legal update, or view his blog of recent cases.
The California Appellate Law Podcast thanks Casetext for sponsoring the podcast. Listeners receive a discount on Casetext Basic Research at casetext.com/CALP. The co-hosts, Jeff and Tim, were also invited to try Casetext’s newest technology, CoCounsel, the world’s first AI legal assistant. You can discover CoCounsel for yourself with a demo and free trial at casetext.com/CoCounsel.
Other items discussed in the episode:
- Tim’s writeup on Hous. Auth. of City of Calexico v. Multi-Housing Tax Credit Partners XXIX, L.P. (D4d1 Aug. 28, 2023) No. D079967. And Cable Connection, Inc. v. DIRECTV, Inc. (2008) 44 Cal.4th 1334.
- Tim’s writeup on Marriage of Bush (D4d3 Jun. 15, 2023 No. G061202) 2023 WL 4013349 (nonpub. opn.).
- Tim’s writeup on Navellier v. Putnam (D1d5 Aug. 17, 2023) No. A166476.
- Tim’s writeup on Sweeney v. Reg'l Water Quality Control Bd. (D1d3 Aug. 31, 2023) No. A166629 (nonpub. opn.).
- New rule 10.1014 of the California Rules of Court allows anyone to submit a contention that an administrative presiding justice or a presiding justice has not properly addressed or managed an important matter related to the administration of a Court of Appeal or a division of a Court of Appeal. A person submitting such a contention should use the following addresses: By email: AppellateRule10.1014@jud.ca.gov By mail: Judicial Council of California Attn: Rule 10.1014 Program 2860 Gateway Oaks Drive, #400 Sacramento
- Off Topics: Do Lawyers Like Legalese And Why Does It Persist?
- Videos from this episode will be posted at Tim Kowal’s YouTube channel.
131 episodes
Partager
