))
It’s All in The Fine Print – Are Arbitration Clauses Unconscionable and Do They Apply Retroactively?
Manage episode 320498891 series 3278602
Contenu fourni par Smith Freed Eberhard. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Smith Freed Eberhard ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Welcome to The Briefing - a legal podcast by Smith Freed Eberhard. We will provide insight and analysis on new Oregon and Washington case law, litigation innovation and technology, the insurance marketplace, and firm news.
In this week's episode Partner Gordon Klug discusses Smith Freed Eberhard's latest Legal Alert, "It’s All in The Fine Print – Are Arbitration Clauses Unconscionable and Do They Apply Retroactively?". The Washington Court of Appeals held that the trial court erred in denying a motion to compel arbitration without first having an evidentiary hearing, because the facts were insufficient to support a finding that the arbitration agreement was unconscionable.
25 episodes
Partager
