Why Protestants Have Thinner Bibles than Roman Catholics with John Meade

That’ll Preach

Contenu fourni par thatllpreachpodcast. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par thatllpreachpodcast ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

2M ago 1:21:19

MP3•Maison d'episode

There’s a common myth that Martin Luther cut out seven books of the Old Testament as a way to remove biblical support for Roman Catholic doctrines. In reality the early church disputed whether to include the “deuterocanon” or “apocrypha” from the Old Testament Scriptures and this debate carried on until the Council of Trent in 1545. So why did the Reformers reject books like 1-2 Maccabees, Tobit, Judith, and Wisdom of Solomon, not to mention additional chapters of both Esther and Daniel? And how does recent scholarship on this issue get to the bottom of this dispute? John Meade From Phoenix Seminary joins us to shed light on this controversy by looking at early church canon lists and little known facts about the Reformers, Trent, Augustine, Jerome, and the significance of the collection of OT Greek translations called the “Septuagint”.

Show Notes

John’s Books:

Scribes and Scripture: https://a.co/d/eW0vPYT

The Biblical Canon Lists From Early Christianity: https://a.co/d/ettaa2R

Support us on Patreon

Website: thatllpreach.io

IG: thatllpreachpodcast

YouTube Channel

101 episodes

#Religion #Christianity #thatllpreachpodcast