))
Episode #121 R.P. Peluce talks with participant Miriam about censorship, free expression and cultural appropriation
Manage episode 424650355 series 2780951
Contenu fourni par Dena Shottenkirk. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Dena Shottenkirk ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
1:00 R.P. Peluce and Miriam discuss the negative impact of censorship, particularly in the context of online conversations where remarks can be permanent and easily accessible.
2:30 Miriam notes the emergence of cancel culture in the age of YouTube and online permanence. Also, she reflects on the illiberal nature of censorship and the importance of liberal ideals in facilitating open dialogue and the exchange of ideas.
3:30 They talk about the struggle to navigate conversations within their social justice-oriented cohort, where dissenting views are often overpowered.
4:20 They reflect on instances of self-censorship, acknowledging the tendency to refrain from certain questions or topics in specific social contexts as a means of self-protection.
6:30 Miriam reflects on a conversation with a friend who dismissed her experiences living in Africa as cultural appropriation, citing a specific example involving the Masai people in Kenya.
8:20 Peluce ponders how to acknowledge and respect instances of cultural appropriation while still valuing cultural exchange and sharing. They express uncertainty about finding a balance between these concepts and acknowledge the complexity of the issue.
129 episodes
Partager
