))
'Decoding CJEU Judgments': CELS Seminar
Manage episode 454969094 series 3623336
Contenu fourni par Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, and University of Cambridge. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Faculty of Law, University of Cambridge, Faculty of Law, and University of Cambridge ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Speaker: Eleanor Sharpston KC, Advocate General, CJEU (2006-2020) and Goodhart Professor, University of Cambridge (2023/2024)
Abstract: A common complaint of common lawyers is that the way in which CJEU judgments are written is abstract and obscure. The criticism is levelled most notably at judgments that reply to requests for a preliminary ruling from national courts. Once you understand about language and the Court, there are a lot of hidden clues, if you only know where to look for them. This second seminar is designed to help you squeeze the maximum information out of the text, and alert you to what those formulae you’re reading really mean.
For more information see: https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/weekly-seminar-series
161 episodes
Partager
