))
Fee-Split or 100% Agent: Who Really Makes More? - KJRES-019
Manage episode 282837954 series 2860254
Contenu fourni par Ken Jones. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Ken Jones ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
In this episode of The Ken Jones Real Estate Show I address the debate about who really makes more money; a real estate agent who works in a traditional fee-split firm, or an agent who works in what's called a "100%" firm.
For those of you who don't know, there are basically two types of real estate brokerage companies that an agent can work for: 1. A so-called "fee-split" company where the broker provides various services to the agent and they share the commissions generated by the agent, and 2. A "100%" company where the company doesn't provide anything to the agent, the agent pays all of their own expenses, including advertising, and where the agent is paid 100% of the commissions they generate.
To determine which type of agent makes more money, has a greater return on their invested dollar, and has the lowest level of risk, I create a scenario where I pretend to be an agent who's deciding which type of agent would be more profitable.
To do this, I developed a list of expenses that each type of agent would typically have. I then made the assumption that - under both the fee-split and 100% scenario - the same agent would generate the same number of transaction units at the same price, generating the exact same amount of commission.
Download Agent Income & Expense Sheets at https://KenJonesRealEstate.com/blog
67 episodes
Partager
