))
Did I Totally Misread the Debate? (with Tom LoBianco and Michael Cohen)
Manage episode 439658985 series 3488344
Contenu fourni par Justin Robert Young. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Justin Robert Young ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
In this episode, Justin Robert Young discusses the recent debate between Kamala Harris and Donald Trump with experts Tom LoBianco and Michael Cohen. They analyze the performances of both candidates, focusing on Harris's strategic approach and Trump's chaotic style. The conversation also delves into post-debate polling and predictions for the upcoming election, emphasizing the importance of voter perception and the impact of viral moments in political discourse.
Also, the gang takes a look at polling errors and tipping point states. Notably Pennsylvania and Georgia, and the implications of voter turnout in these regions as the election approaches.
Chapters
04:14 Strategic Imperatives: Campaign Tactics and Goals
07:01 Viral Moments and Public Perception
18:58 Polling Insights: What Comes Next?
44:02 Polling Methodology and Its Importance
46:27 Understanding Sample Sizes in Polling
58:57 Identifying Tipping Point States
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
This is a public episode. If you’d like to discuss this with other subscribers or get access to bonus episodes, visit politicspoliticspolitics.substack.com/subscribe
338 episodes
Partager
