Artwork

Contenu fourni par Rhodri Davies. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Rhodri Davies ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Application Podcast
Mettez-vous hors ligne avec l'application Player FM !

Tris Lumley (NPC): Open Philanthropy

59:02
 
Partager
 

Manage episode 356789505 series 2996310
Contenu fourni par Rhodri Davies. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Rhodri Davies ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

On this episode, as part of our occasional mini-series in partnership with NPC, we talk to Tris Lumley about open philanthropy: what it is, why it is important, and how we make it happen. Including:

  • What is NPC’s Open Philanthropy project? How did it come about?
  • How has NPC been putting some of its thinking about open philanthropy into practice?
  • What is the difference between “outward openness” and “inward openness” in philanthropy?
  • Do foundations (and donors) need to be more transparent?
  • If so, why? (Is this primarily about making philanthropy more legitimate, or more effective/efficient?)
  • What do they need to be open about? (e.g. income, spending, diversity of staff/trustees, how decisions are made etc).
  • How can we make use of open data in philanthropy?
  • Why might some funders be reluctant to be more open? Is this ever justified?
  • Does philanthropy need to get better at valuing different forms of knowledge?
  • How do you balance the value of experience and the value of expertise?
  • Are there challenges for traditional grantmakers when it comes to bringing communities and people with lived experience into decision making processes?
  • What does the focus on inclusion mean for our approaches to measurement?
  • How important is core-cost and multi-year funding when it comes to making philanthropy more inwardly open?
  • Is trust-based philanthropy more open (i.e. because it asks less of grantees in terms of reporting etc), or more closed (i.e. because it relies on developing trusting relationships and can therefore become cliquey)?

Related Links

  continue reading

70 episodes

Artwork
iconPartager
 
Manage episode 356789505 series 2996310
Contenu fourni par Rhodri Davies. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Rhodri Davies ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

On this episode, as part of our occasional mini-series in partnership with NPC, we talk to Tris Lumley about open philanthropy: what it is, why it is important, and how we make it happen. Including:

  • What is NPC’s Open Philanthropy project? How did it come about?
  • How has NPC been putting some of its thinking about open philanthropy into practice?
  • What is the difference between “outward openness” and “inward openness” in philanthropy?
  • Do foundations (and donors) need to be more transparent?
  • If so, why? (Is this primarily about making philanthropy more legitimate, or more effective/efficient?)
  • What do they need to be open about? (e.g. income, spending, diversity of staff/trustees, how decisions are made etc).
  • How can we make use of open data in philanthropy?
  • Why might some funders be reluctant to be more open? Is this ever justified?
  • Does philanthropy need to get better at valuing different forms of knowledge?
  • How do you balance the value of experience and the value of expertise?
  • Are there challenges for traditional grantmakers when it comes to bringing communities and people with lived experience into decision making processes?
  • What does the focus on inclusion mean for our approaches to measurement?
  • How important is core-cost and multi-year funding when it comes to making philanthropy more inwardly open?
  • Is trust-based philanthropy more open (i.e. because it asks less of grantees in terms of reporting etc), or more closed (i.e. because it relies on developing trusting relationships and can therefore become cliquey)?

Related Links

  continue reading

70 episodes

Tous les épisodes

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenue sur Lecteur FM!

Lecteur FM recherche sur Internet des podcasts de haute qualité que vous pourrez apprécier dès maintenant. C'est la meilleure application de podcast et fonctionne sur Android, iPhone et le Web. Inscrivez-vous pour synchroniser les abonnements sur tous les appareils.

 

Guide de référence rapide