Artwork

Contenu fourni par Rhodri Davies. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Rhodri Davies ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Application Podcast
Mettez-vous hors ligne avec l'application Player FM !

Pluralism in Philanthropy

1:14:01
 
Partager
 

Manage episode 364296712 series 2996310
Contenu fourni par Rhodri Davies. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Rhodri Davies ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

In this episode we take a deep dive into an issue that has been generating a lot of debate recently: is pluralism in philanthropy a good thing, or not? Including:

  • What has caused the latest furore, and what has the reaction been?
  • Is philanthropic freedom genuinely under threat, and if so why? Or is this just a straw man?
  • Should donors and foundations be free to "engage in the unfettered pursuit of their own mission, interests and prerogatives", or are there arguments for constraining this freedom?
  • Is there an inherent tension in philanthropy between individual liberty and systemic equity? How can we balance these competing demands?
  • Should we value pluralism because it enables diversity of thought and values, and provides the material for a healthy "battle of ideas" that can strengthen democracy?
  • Is pluralism a necessary part of allowing marginalised groups and communities to overcome the "tyranny of the majority" and drive social change?
  • Is accepting that civil society will contain things we may not like or agree with the necessary cost of pluralism? Is this a price worth paying?
  • Is pluralism a noble idea in theory but naive in practice, when in reality power is skewed towards defence of the status quo and vested interests?
  • Can everyday giving help to produce a form of pluralism that avoids some of the problems that come when we rely on elite philanthropy?
  • Do we need to constrain pluralism, and if so how?
  • To what extent is this a US-specific debate?
  • Do nonprofits need to be "civil" or "polite" when they disagree? Or does this ignore the historical reality of social change?

Related links

  continue reading

67 episodes

Artwork
iconPartager
 
Manage episode 364296712 series 2996310
Contenu fourni par Rhodri Davies. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Rhodri Davies ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

In this episode we take a deep dive into an issue that has been generating a lot of debate recently: is pluralism in philanthropy a good thing, or not? Including:

  • What has caused the latest furore, and what has the reaction been?
  • Is philanthropic freedom genuinely under threat, and if so why? Or is this just a straw man?
  • Should donors and foundations be free to "engage in the unfettered pursuit of their own mission, interests and prerogatives", or are there arguments for constraining this freedom?
  • Is there an inherent tension in philanthropy between individual liberty and systemic equity? How can we balance these competing demands?
  • Should we value pluralism because it enables diversity of thought and values, and provides the material for a healthy "battle of ideas" that can strengthen democracy?
  • Is pluralism a necessary part of allowing marginalised groups and communities to overcome the "tyranny of the majority" and drive social change?
  • Is accepting that civil society will contain things we may not like or agree with the necessary cost of pluralism? Is this a price worth paying?
  • Is pluralism a noble idea in theory but naive in practice, when in reality power is skewed towards defence of the status quo and vested interests?
  • Can everyday giving help to produce a form of pluralism that avoids some of the problems that come when we rely on elite philanthropy?
  • Do we need to constrain pluralism, and if so how?
  • To what extent is this a US-specific debate?
  • Do nonprofits need to be "civil" or "polite" when they disagree? Or does this ignore the historical reality of social change?

Related links

  continue reading

67 episodes

كل الحلقات

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenue sur Lecteur FM!

Lecteur FM recherche sur Internet des podcasts de haute qualité que vous pourrez apprécier dès maintenant. C'est la meilleure application de podcast et fonctionne sur Android, iPhone et le Web. Inscrivez-vous pour synchroniser les abonnements sur tous les appareils.

 

Guide de référence rapide