Constitutional Challenges in Immigration Enforcement

Immigration Nerds

Contenu fourni par Erickson Immigration Group. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Erickson Immigration Group ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

1M ago 22:33

MP3•Maison d'episode

Federal judges in Georgia and Texas challenge the process of anti-discrimination enforcement by questioning the constitutionality of administrative law judges' authority.

In two separate cases involving SpaceX and Walmart, the courts weigh in on whether administrative law judges can render decisions without adequate oversight from the President or Attorney General. Join Immigration Nerds host, Lauren Clarke, and legal expert Cyrus D. Mehta as they explore the potential implications of these rulings on immigration enforcement and corporate accountability in the latest episode of the Immigration Nerds Podcast.

GUEST: Cyrus Mehta, managing partner at Cyrus D. Mehta & Partners

HOST: Lauren Clarke, EIG Senior Attorney

NEWS NERD: Rob Taylor, EIG Partner and Shareholder

PRODUCER: Adam Belmar

SHOW RESOURCE LINKS:

Walmart Prevails on Claims DOJ’s Judges Are Unconstitutional

SpaceX Wins Anti-Migrant Bias Case | The Dallas Express

SpaceX, Walmart Court Wins Imperil US Immigration Bias Cases | Bloomberg LAW

200 episodes

#Politics #Erickson Immigration Group #Society #Government #News