Artwork

Contenu fourni par John Danaher. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par John Danaher ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Application Podcast
Mettez-vous hors ligne avec l'application Player FM !

Episode #53 – Christin on How Algorithms Actually Impact Workers

 
Partager
 

Manage episode 227555219 series 1328245
Contenu fourni par John Danaher. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par John Danaher ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

Angele Christin

In this episode I talk to Angèle Christin. Angèle is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication at Stanford University, where she is also affiliated with the Sociology Department and Program in Science, Technology, and Society. Her research focuses on how algorithms and analytics transform professional values, expertise, and work practices. She is currently working on a book on the use of audience metrics in web journalism and a project on the use of risk assessment algorithms in criminal justice. We talk about both.

You can download the episode here or listen below. You can also subscribe to the show on iTunes or Stitcher (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 1:30 – What’s missing from the current debate about algorithmic governance? What does Angèle’s ethnographic perspective add?
  • 5:10 – How does ethnography work? What does an ethnographer do?
  • 8:30 – What are the limitations of ethnographic studies?
  • 12:33 – Why did Angèle focus on the use of algorithms in criminal justice and web journalism?
  • 23:06 – What were Angèle’s two key research findings? Decoupling and Buffering
  • 24:40 – What is ‘decoupling’ and how does it happen?
  • 30:00 – Different attitudes to algorithmic tools in the US and France (French journalists, perhaps surprisingly, more obsessed with real time analytics than their American counterparts)
  • 39:20 – What explains the ambivalent attitude to metrics in different professions?
  • 44:42 – What is ‘buffering’ and how does it arise?
  • 54:30 – How people who worry about algorithms might misunderstand the practical realities of criminal justice
  • 57:47 – Does the resistance/acceptance of an algorithmic tool depend on the nature of the tool and the nature of the workplace? What might the relevant variables be?

Relevant Links

  continue reading

64 episodes

Artwork
iconPartager
 
Manage episode 227555219 series 1328245
Contenu fourni par John Danaher. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par John Danaher ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.

Angele Christin

In this episode I talk to Angèle Christin. Angèle is an assistant professor in the Department of Communication at Stanford University, where she is also affiliated with the Sociology Department and Program in Science, Technology, and Society. Her research focuses on how algorithms and analytics transform professional values, expertise, and work practices. She is currently working on a book on the use of audience metrics in web journalism and a project on the use of risk assessment algorithms in criminal justice. We talk about both.

You can download the episode here or listen below. You can also subscribe to the show on iTunes or Stitcher (the RSS feed is here).

Show Notes

  • 0:00 – Introduction
  • 1:30 – What’s missing from the current debate about algorithmic governance? What does Angèle’s ethnographic perspective add?
  • 5:10 – How does ethnography work? What does an ethnographer do?
  • 8:30 – What are the limitations of ethnographic studies?
  • 12:33 – Why did Angèle focus on the use of algorithms in criminal justice and web journalism?
  • 23:06 – What were Angèle’s two key research findings? Decoupling and Buffering
  • 24:40 – What is ‘decoupling’ and how does it happen?
  • 30:00 – Different attitudes to algorithmic tools in the US and France (French journalists, perhaps surprisingly, more obsessed with real time analytics than their American counterparts)
  • 39:20 – What explains the ambivalent attitude to metrics in different professions?
  • 44:42 – What is ‘buffering’ and how does it arise?
  • 54:30 – How people who worry about algorithms might misunderstand the practical realities of criminal justice
  • 57:47 – Does the resistance/acceptance of an algorithmic tool depend on the nature of the tool and the nature of the workplace? What might the relevant variables be?

Relevant Links

  continue reading

64 episodes

すべてのエピソード

×
 
Loading …

Bienvenue sur Lecteur FM!

Lecteur FM recherche sur Internet des podcasts de haute qualité que vous pourrez apprécier dès maintenant. C'est la meilleure application de podcast et fonctionne sur Android, iPhone et le Web. Inscrivez-vous pour synchroniser les abonnements sur tous les appareils.

 

Guide de référence rapide