))
How can we ensure that global surveillance programs like the one Snowden exposed are good for society? - Michael Vogman
Manage episode 311957405 series 3205773
Contenu fourni par Adam Kruger. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Adam Kruger ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
In this episode, Michael Vogman and I discuss global surveillance programs and how they related to the tradeoff between privacy and security.
Follow-up questions we discussed included:
- How do you balance the need for safety and security with privacy?
- Is it inevitable that we will have to surveil everyone given technology/weapons are getting more and more powerful?
- Let’s say the right thing to do is surveil everyone, but the public wouldn’t agree to it; should the government do it secretly in our best interest?
- Google CEO Eric Schmidt articulated a blunt defence in a famous 2009 interview with Maria Bartiromo. “If you have something that you don’t want anyone to know,” Schmidt said, “maybe you shouldn’t be doing that in the first place.”; do you buy this argument against privacy? It’s known as the “nothing to hide” argument
- Would you be supportive of a software program owned by the government listening in on all phone and in-person conversations that flags when you say certain things? What about something implanted like Neuralink that monitors your thoughts?
- Are privacy and security in opposition? Can we achieve both?
Relevant article:
The Personal Privacy vs. Public Security Dilemma | RealClearPolitics
Get help building habits with everyday.
Sign-up here to join me for an episode!
I'd also love feedback for improving future episodes.
Thanks for listening!
68 episodes
Partager
