Lawyer Talk: Off The Record podcast

23:03

Are your people, processes, and platforms delivering value or to drive better customer experiences, or are they—and your CX—disconnected and siloed? Agility requires a willingness to adapt and evolve, as well as a deep understanding of how customer trust is built (or broken) through simplicity, personalization, and empowered employees. Today, we're going to talk about how brands can transform their customer experience using AI-powered strategies. To help me discuss this topic, I'd like to welcome, John Durocher, Chief Customer Officer at Calix. About John Durocher John Durocher leads the award-winning Calix Customer Success organization as chief customer officer. In his previous role as executive vice president of customer success at Salesforce, he led the teams actively engaged with Salesforce global customers. Prior to joining Salesforce.com, Mr. Durocher spent 17 years with Accenture's financial services practice and has a solid track record of planning, and executing growth initiatives, and a passion for bringing innovative ideas to clients. Mr. Durocher is recognized as a thought-leader in Customer Relationship Management (CRM), authoring a number of papers and articles that have been published in industry and research publications. Mr. Durocher has also been actively involved in developing software solutions for the Financial Services Industry and is a patent holder on several that have been deployed globally. John Durocher on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/johndurocher/ Resources Calix: https://www.calix.com Don't miss Calix's ConneXions conference, October 18 – 21, 2025 at the Wynn Resort in Las Vegas. Learn more and register here: https://www.calix.com/events/connexions.html Keep up with the latest B2B Marketing insights by following the B2B Agility Podcast: https://www.b2bagility.com Connect with Greg on LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/gregkihlstrom Check out The Agile Brand Guide website with articles, insights, and Martechipedia, the wiki for marketing technology: https://www.agilebrandguide.com "…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record explicit

maison des série•Feed

Join Steve Palmer, a seasoned criminal defense lawyer, as he shares valuable legal insights on DUI, traffic stops, and your rights in the legal system. For more, visit www.palmerlegaldefense.com. Recorded at Channel 511 in Columbus, Ohio: www.channel511.com

469 episodes

#Special Guests

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record explicit

updated il y a environ 8 jours

maison des série•Feed

469 episodes

#Special Guests

Tous les épisodes

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Can The Cops Keep My Money? | They Don't Teach You That In Law School 24:28

il y a environ 8 jours24:28

24:28

If you’ve ever wondered whether just carrying a large sum of cash could land you in legal hot water—or what steps you can take if it happens to you—this episode is a must-listen. Host Steve Palmer is joined by Troy Hendrickson, a law student, to tackle the not-so-theoretical question: What really happens if the police take your cash during a routine traffic stop? Steve and Troy unravel the complexities behind asset forfeiture, sharing real-life cases where drivers have had tens of thousands of dollars seized by law enforcement—sometimes with little explanation or due process. Together, discuss the legal procedures that should protect your property rights, what “due process” really means in these situations, and how a legal team actually fights to recover seized money. They also dig into the difference between criminal charges and civil asset forfeiture, dispel myths about what cash in your car “proves,” and highlight the burdens of proof on both sides. Plus, they candidly share the frustrations and realities of navigating police departments, public records, and the sometimes slow-moving wheels of justice. Moments 00:00 "Due Process and Contraband Notices" 03:57 Criminal Indictment and Asset Forfeiture 07:01 "Seeking Legal Help" 09:48 "Money Laundering Charges Negotiation" 13:58 Drug Mule Traffic Stop Explained 17:13 Money Possession Isn't Criminal 22:54 Roadside Bribe in Costa Rica Here are 3 key takeaways you should know: Due Process Should Prevail (But Doesn’t Always): The system is supposed to require official notice and a chance to fight for your seized property. But real-world cases often leave people in limbo, unable to get a straight answer or their assets back without taking legal action. Just Having Cash Is Not a Crime: Simply possessing large sums of money—even if it sets off police suspicions—is not illegal. The government needs something more than "it looks fishy" or "a dog sniffed it" to justify permanent seizure. Challenging Seizure Is Complicated and Costly: To recover seized money, you often have to initiate a civil lawsuit, shouldering the burden to prove it's your property and that the government is holding it. This process can be lengthy, expensive, and stacked against innocent owners. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Breaking Down Diddy's Trial: Legal Motions and Strategies Explained | They Don't Teach You That in Law School 19:20

il y a environ 15 jours19:20

19:20

If you’re curious about the machinery of high-stakes criminal trials, want to understand the strategy behind post-conviction moves, or just love hearing behind-the-scenes details from seasoned legal minds, this episode’s for you. Welcome back to Lawyer Talk, where legal education meets real-world controversy! In this episode, host Steve Palmer teams up with law student Troy Hendrickson for a special "law school edition" focused on the high-profile P Diddy trial. The guys dig into the nitty gritty of what happens between conviction and sentencing, breaking down the so-called “throwaway” post-trial motions and whether they ever actually work. From LeBron James’ famous party quote to the real implications of a compromise verdict, Steve and Troy peel back the layers of legal strategy used in Diddy’s defense—discussing grand juries, jury instructions, and the difference between a good argument and a long shot. They also cover why lawyers sometimes file motions more for publicity than for results, and what kind of jail time credit Diddy might expect after almost two years behind bars. Moments 00:00 "Strategic 'Throwaway' Court Motions" 04:42 "Trial Objections and Appeals" 06:47 "Always Object in Court" 10:14 "Grand Jury's Role Examined" 14:50 "Prosecutorial Misconduct Claim Raised" 16:54 Sentencing Guidelines and Considerations 19:39 "Struggling for Connection" 3 Key Takeaways: Post-Trial Motions Matter (But Aren’t Magic Bullets): Defense attorneys often file motions for a new trial between conviction and sentencing. While many see these as “throwaway” or strategic filings, sometimes they’re essential for preserving arguments or highlighting egregious errors like jury misconduct. Grand Jury Isn’t Always a Shield: The episode highlights how the grand jury process, intended as a safeguard against baseless charges, is often procedural rather than protective. Prosecutors nearly always get indictments—even with flimsy evidence—making it challenging for defendants facing stacked charges. Publicity & Sentencing Strategy: High-profile cases come with unique challenges. Lawyers might file post-conviction motions not just for legal reasons, but also to shape public perception. Additionally, sentencing memoranda and jail-time credit play big roles in the ultimate outcome, sometimes overlooked in law school teachings. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Why Waive a Jury? Inside a Recent Judge Trial Decision | Lawyer Talk Q&A 5:04

il y a environ 27 jours5:04

5:04

If you want to know what goes into courtroom decision-making when the pressure is on, you’ll want to hear this one. Welcome back to Lawyer Talk! I'm Steve Palmer, and in this episode, I’m giving you an inside look at a recent trial I just finished—one that didn’t have a jury. Instead, my client and I made the tough decision to waive his right to a jury trial, choosing to have a judge decide his fate. I’ll walk you through exactly why I rarely take cases in front of just a judge, what made this case unique, and the careful reasoning behind our strategy—especially when there are tricky legal technicalities involved. I’ll also share some thoughts on what it really means to get a fair trial, whether it’s with a jury or a judge. Three key takeaways: Strategic Choice Matters: Opting for a bench (judge-only) trial can be the right path when a case hinges on a nuanced, technical legal issue that a jury might not fully grasp. Deep Client Collaboration: The decision isn’t made lightly. It involves honest conversations about risks, pros, and cons, making sure the client is 100% involved all the way. Presentation Still Counts: While the theatrics are toned down for a judge, it’s crucial to present evidence clearly and treat the judge as the "fact finder"—advocating with the same intensity as if speaking to a jury. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
The Challenges Facing Lawyers in the Charlie Kirk Assassination Case | Lawyer Talk Q&A 6:18

il y a environ 28 jours6:18

6:18

On this episode of Lawyer Talk, I’m going off the record and on the air to answer the many questions I’ve been getting about the Tyler Robinson case, which is making headlines for its connection to the Charlie Kirk assassination. I’ll be clearing up some misunderstandings about the evidence—especially when it comes to fingerprints and DNA—and giving you a clearer picture of what the legal process looks like from here. I’ll also share my take on what it’s really like to defend someone in a high-profile case like this, from dealing with the media circus to the practical challenges lawyers face behind the scenes. Top Takeaways: Evidence Scrutiny is Critical: Defense attorneys always start by dissecting the prosecution's evidence—including DNA, fingerprints, and the context surrounding them. As Steve notes, just because certain evidence is cited in a probable cause affidavit doesn’t make the case airtight; robust discovery and expert analysis are essential. Taking on Death Penalty Defense is a Massive Undertaking: These cases can last well over a year and consume significant resources. Most are handled by private lawyers appointed (and underpaid) by the state, not full-time public defenders, which can impact their own legal practices. Expertise and Resources Make or Break the Case: Successfully defending a death penalty case often requires applying for court-approved experts in forensics, cell phone data, and beyond. The responsibility is immense—not only for the client, but for the integrity of the justice process. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Can Police Seize What They Weren’t Looking For During a Search | Lawyer Talk Q & A 4:23

il y a environ 29 jours4:23

4:23

I’m answering a great follow-up question that came straight from our producer, Brett at Circle 270 Media. After talking about search warrants and the “four corners” requirement, Brett asked: What happens if the police are searching for one thing, like a brick of cocaine, but while they're lawfully inside your house, they stumble on something else illegal—say, an unlawful firearm? I walk you through the nuts and bolts of the Fourth Amendment, explaining how the “plain view” exception actually works and what it means if a search warrant turns out to be invalid. I’ll break down how law enforcement can—and can’t—use what they find, and why things like the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine can make or break a case. If you’ve ever wondered what really happens when police find the unexpected during a search, this episode is for you. Key takeaways: Plain View Doctrine: If law enforcement is lawfully present (with a valid warrant) and spots contraband in plain view, they are legally allowed to seize it—even if it’s not what they were originally searching for. Invalid Warrants Have Consequences: If a search warrant is later found invalid, any evidence found, including that seen in plain view, can be excluded from court under the “fruit of the poisonous tree” doctrine. Scope of Search Matters: Police can’t look for “an elephant in a shoebox.” If the warrant is for a large object (like a machine gun), searching small containers exceeds the scope—unless the warrant includes broader language about searching for related items. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Understanding Direct vs Indirect Criminal Appeals and Procedural Pitfalls | What's The Appeal? 4:24

il y a 5 weeks4:24

4:24

I’m tackling the twists and turns of the criminal appellate process—particularly the difference between direct and indirect appeals, also known as post-conviction or habeas corpus actions. I’m drawing directly from my experiences and real questions that come up in my practice, breaking down what I call the “appellate ladder” that anyone must climb after a conviction, especially here in Ohio. I’ll explain why you can’t just skip steps in the appeal process, even if it feels like it might save time or money. Skipping a rung can create procedural traps, especially if you’re hoping to take your case up to the federal courts later on. I know how tempting it can be to jump ahead, but I’ll show you why following every step is crucial if you want a real shot at relief. I’m here to cut through the legal jargon and share practical advice for anyone facing an appeal—or just curious about how the process really works. And yes, I’ll even throw in a Mario Bros. analogy to make it all a bit more fun. Stick around if you want to understand the true “appeal” of appeals! Moments 00:00 Consider indirect appeal first; it's often more successful and cost-effective than the direct appeal, saving time and legal resources. 03:30 Habeas corpus in federal court is complex; missing technicalities at the state level can lead to case dismissal. Here are 3 key takeaways from the episode: There Are Two Appellate Ladders: The criminal appellate process includes a direct appeal (challenging errors from the trial as recorded in the official record) and an indirect or post-conviction appeal (addressing issues outside the record). Both play crucial roles. Don’t Skip Steps: As tempting as it is to save time and money by jumping straight to the “stronger” argument, skipping any step in the ladder can lead to procedural default —meaning federal courts may not even consider your case. Strategic Foresight is Vital: Allowing each court level to rule preserves your right to seek relief at the federal level (like habeas corpus). Shortcuts, unfortunately, just aren’t an option in appellate law. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
How to Challenge Search Warrants | Lawyer Talk Q & A 9:51

il y a 5 weeks9:51

9:51

In this Q&A episode, I answer a question about search warrants and explain the difference between a standard motion to suppress and the all-important Franks motion. Responding to a listener’s question, I break down how police affidavits are used to obtain search warrants, what happens when there’s a lack of probable cause, and what it means if law enforcement lies—or leaves out key information—when seeking a warrant. I walk you through how the Fourth Amendment protects your privacy, how courtroom strategies develop, and why it’s so important to keep solid communication with your defense attorney if you’re ever facing criminal charges. Whether you’re caught up in your own case or just curious how all this plays out in real life, this episode gives you a practical, step-by-step guide straight from my experience in the trenches. Moments 00:00 Under the Fourth Amendment, law enforcement must present a sworn statement or affidavit to a judge, establishing probable cause and a nexus between the search location and evidence of criminal activity. 03:41 Exclusionary rule: Illegally obtained evidence is inadmissible in court; supports motions like suppressing evidence or Frank's motion. 08:35 Discuss police report discrepancies at Frank's hearings; consult your lawyer for strategy and communication. Here are my top 3 takeaways: Know the Difference: A traditional motion to suppress focuses exclusively on what’s contained within the “four corners” of the search warrant affidavit. If the affidavit lacks probable cause, that’s your argument. A Franks motion takes it a step further—challenging the truthfulness of the statements in that affidavit. If police knowingly lied or omitted critical information, the entire warrant (and seized evidence) can be thrown out. Procedural Impact Matters: Motion to suppress hearings are mostly decided on the documents—you don’t typically get to call witnesses or present new evidence. Franks motions can turn into full-blown evidentiary hearings, where you get to subpoena officers, cross-examine them, and introduce evidence showing intentional falsehoods or omissions. Strategic Use: Skilled defense attorneys often file both types—creating multiple avenues to contest the evidence and strengthen your client’s defense. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
What Happens Next? Legal Steps Following the Tragic Charlie Kirk Assassination | Legal Breakdown 1:00:06

il y a 6 weeks1:00:06

1:00:06

Whether you’re curious about the details of the preliminary hearing, how the defense will handle the mountain of evidence, or why even the most reviled defendants still deserve a robust legal defense, this episode will unpack the complexities and answer your pressing questions as the case unfolds. This is what you NEED to know about how the justice system will handle the country’s highest-profile case right now. The Basics: No Grand Jury in Utah Utah does things differently—there’s NO grand jury. Prosecutors file charges directly, supported by a probable cause affidavit. This initial phase is all about protecting everyone’s rights, even for the accused in horrific crimes. Why Probable Cause Matters A probable cause statement lays out the evidence/accusations, so prosecutors can’t just grab anyone off the street. It’s a paper trail under oath of what the State knows so far. Initial Appearance: Enter the Accused The defendant’s first court appearance was done over Zoom/WebEx for safety (think: avoid any “Jack Ruby” moments; if you know, you know). At this appearance, charges are read out loud to give proper notice. No Bond—And Why Because the DA is seeking the death penalty, Utah law doesn’t allow for bond in these cases. The defense can’t even make a pitch for release. Next Up: The Preliminary Hearing Showdown This is the big one! It’s a live mini-trial where prosecutors have to show the judge enough evidence (probable cause) to move forward. Unlike secret grand juries, this is an open court. If prosecutors flop, the case is dismissed. Expect this hearing to be highly watched. Public Defenders = Real Lawyers Don’t knock court-appointed counsel! Death penalty cases require certified, highly trained lawyers. The defense gets the budget for experts—think DNA, ballistics, cyber-forensics. Mountains of Evidence = Slow Process With “truckloads of discovery”—every text, Discord chat, DNA swab—review takes TIME. The right to a speedy trial is for the defendant, but in reality, you can’t prep a case of this scale in a few months. Constitutional Protections Are for Everyone “This case exemplifies why we have these rights”—even for those accused of monstrous acts. The goal: avoid botched trials, which can lead to appeals and more pain for everyone. Strategy Talk: What Will the Defense Do? Expect the defense to check the client’s competency, dig into all the digital evidence, and build rapport (trust is HARD when the system appoints your lawyer). Every fact counts. Will the Public See Everything? Not likely. Much discovery stays in the hands of lawyers—public interest is huge, but releasing it all risks poisoning the jury pool and jeopardizing witnesses. What’s Next? Possible Outcomes… Dismissal at preliminary hearing (unlikely, but possible if evidence falls short) Plea deal (maybe in exchange for info on other involved parties) Full-blown jury trial (with a death penalty phase if convicted) The Emotional Toll on Lawyers Even veteran defense attorneys admit: Sometimes a case hits too close to home. If emotions might interfere, you step aside. The system only works if both sides are at their best. Bottom line: This is the justice system in the public eye—every step under scrutiny. Don’t let the info vacuum fuel wild theories; wait for facts, demand answers, watch the legal process unfold. Moments 00:00 Understanding Probable Cause Statements 08:12 Reduced Risks in Prisoner Transport 14:17 "Aggravating Circumstances in Question" 18:21 Court-Appointed Death Penalty Certification 26:31 Experienced Lawyers Essential for Complex Cases 31:40 "Client Transparency Crucial for Defense" 35:04 Complex Case: Speedy Trial Unlikely 40:11 Gun Dismantling Raises Trust Issues 42:58 Unfolding Case Analysis Questions 50:29 Guilt and Death Penalty Phases 54:09 Defense Strategy in Death Penalty Cases 58:26 Ensuring a Competent Legal Defense Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Lawyer-Client Communication | They Don't Teach You That In Law School 19:16

il y a 7 weeks19:16

19:16

From navigating the temptations (and pitfalls) of using your personal cell phone for business to setting clear expectations with clients—especially when things move slowly, like in appellate cases—we get real about the day-to-day struggles of keeping clients informed without burning out. We discuss why establishing boundaries from the start is not just practical but essential, and how maintaining professionalism with friends and family as clients can be a minefield if not handled properly. Whether you’re in law school, thinking about practice management, or just aiming to survive your legal career without drowning in missed texts and client frustration, this episode is packed with honest insights, actionable tips, and the kind of advice every law student wishes they’d gotten sooner. So grab your notebook—because these are the lessons they don’t teach you in law school. Here are our top 3 takeaways: Set Communication Expectations from the Start Make it clear to clients how, when, and where you’ll communicate. This prevents missed messages, unrealistic demands, and misunderstandings. Keep Client Communication Organized and Secure Avoid mixing personal devices with client business. Use law practice management tools (with secure messaging) to ensure everything is confidential, logged, and accessible when you need it. Treat Friends and Family as Clients—Professionally The temptation to “bend the rules” for those you know can backfire. Use the same intake and communication protocols for everyone; it ensures nothing slips through the cracks. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Texas v. Johnson and the Ongoing Flag Burning Controversy | Lawyer Talk Breakdown 5:42

il y a 7 weeks5:42

5:42

If you’ve ever wondered who really makes laws in this country or what happens when protest and free speech collide, stick around. Let's look at President Trump’s executive order on flag burning. There’s a lot of chatter out there about what an executive order actually is, what power the president really has, and how the Constitution fits into all this—and honestly, a lot of people are getting it wrong. So, I’m here to clear things up. I’ll break down exactly what Trump is trying to do with this order, why it’s not quite what some people think, and what the law actually says about flag burning (hint: we’re talking about First Amendment rights and the Supreme Court’s big decision in Texas v. Johnson). Additionally, I’ll share a great quote from Justice Scalia and discuss why our right to criticize the government—even in contentious ways—matters so much. Here’s the real story, beyond the barstool chatter and media soundbites: Executive Orders Aren’t Laws The President can issue executive orders to guide administrative agencies, but they can’t make new laws—that power comes from Congress. The Limits of Presidential Power Executive actions can’t override the Constitution. Flag burning, for example, is considered symbolic speech protected by the First Amendment (see: Texas v. Johnson, 1989). Fighting Words & Incitement Matter Trump’s directive targeted flag burning only if it “incites violence”—a narrow exception that still faces tough constitutional scrutiny and likely doesn’t change much in practice. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Can Police Ask for Your ID Without Reason? | Lawyer Talk Q&A 5:40

il y a 7 weeks5:40

5:40

Here's a question from listener Andy: “Do I have to show police my ID if they randomly ask me in public?” I talk about what the law actually says, why some states have specific rules, and how the Supreme Court has weighed in on the whole situation. You’ll get the scoop on what “reasonable suspicion” really means, whether the cops can just stop you for no reason, and what you should know if you ever find yourself in this spot. If you’ve ever wondered where your rights begin and end during a police encounter, this episode is for you. Key Takeaways: Police Need Reasonable Suspicion: Officers can’t randomly demand ID from anyone on the street—they must have a “reasonable suspicion” that some criminal activity is occurring. State Laws Vary: Many states, including Ohio, have “stop and identify” statutes. Even so, these laws typically still require a valid reason for the stop; it can’t be completely arbitrary. Emergency Exceptions Are Limited: While there are some situations (like an active crime scene or search for a suspect) where police have broader authority to request identification, these exceptions are carefully scrutinized by courts. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Understanding Implied Consent and Breathalyzer Refusal Consequences | Lawyer Talk Q&A 4:35

il y a 8 weeks4:35

4:35

I’m explaining the confusing world of DUI breath tests and answering one of the most common questions I get: should you take a breathalyzer if police stop you? Based on real questions from listeners and my own experience as a lawyer, I'm breaking down the concept of “implied consent”—that idea that just by driving in Ohio (and most other states), you’re agreeing to breath testing whether you realize it or not. I explain what really happens if you refuse to take a breath test, clear up some common myths, and get into the details of how the law treats your so-called “right” to refuse. Whether you might face this situation yourself or you just want to understand how these laws work, I’m here with practical advice and smart legal insight. Here are 3 key takeaways for anyone who drives: Implied Consent is Real When you get a driver’s license, you’re implicitly agreeing to submit to breath tests if stopped by law enforcement—not just in Ohio, but across much of the U.S. You Can Refuse, But There Are Consequences Refusing a breathalyzer isn’t as simple as just saying “no.” In Ohio, for example, refusal leads to an immediate administrative license suspension —the officer can literally take your license on the spot. It’s About Evidence & Risk While refusing a test may keep law enforcement from getting direct evidence, it doesn’t mean you avoid penalties. The decision to submit or refuse is nuanced and should factor in both the legal and practical consequences. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
How Much Should Law Clerks Make? | They Don't Teach You That In Law School 23:46

il y a 9 weeks23:46

23:46

In this episode, we are discussing what they never teach you in law school—how the real world of law clerkships really works. Joining me is Troy Hendrickson, my resident law clerk and a current law student, who brings his own fresh experiences to the table. Together, we break down what it actually means to be a law clerk—beyond the fancy titles—and get honest about pay expectations, resume-boosting positions, and the difference between big firm opportunities and the invaluable, hands-on education you get in a smaller practice like mine. We talk money, motivation, government jobs versus the private sector, and why sometimes the most valuable lessons don’t come with the biggest paychecks. If you’re in law school, just starting your legal career, or simply curious about what a clerkship looks like on the ground, you’ll want to hear this conversation. Key Moments 00:00 "Law School vs. Real-World Practice" 03:53 Avoided Big Law Temptations 08:34 Law Salary Expectations Disparity 12:10 Pre-Internet Problem-Solving Skills 14:29 "Mastering Skills Through Experience" 17:25 Paralegals: Efficient Alternatives in AI 19:40 Value Learning Over Initial Pay 22:53 "Law School's Economic Lessons" Here are my top three takeaways: The Prestige and the Pay Are NOT Equal: Big Law may pay top dollar for summer clerks, but not every opportunity is a financial windfall—and often, the most prestigious or educational clerkships pay the least. Don’t overlook the value of experience for resume-building, even if the paycheck is modest. The Real Learning Starts Outside the Classroom: Most of the practical skills that make you valuable in a law practice—drafting, filing, firm workflow—aren’t taught in law school. You’ll learn by doing, often starting with the “menial” work that teaches the business from the ground up. Focus on the Experience (Not Just the Dollars): Especially in smaller firms or government settings, you might earn less, but the breadth of hands-on work and real legal training can set you apart. As Steve pointed out, the value of an opportunity isn’t always reflected on your paycheck—and sometimes, learning how things really work is worth more than a few extra bucks an hour. Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Can You Be Arrested for OVI Below the Legal Limit in Ohio | Lawyer Talk Q&A 5:25

il y a 9 weeks5:25

5:25

I’m Steve Palmer, and today I’m answering a great question sent in by Nancy from Ohio. Her son was arrested for OVI—even though his breath test was 0.07, which is below the state’s legal limit of 0.08. How is that possible? In this episode, I’ll clear up the confusion around Ohio’s OVI laws, explain the difference between “impaired” and “per se” charges, and share how prosecutors build their cases even when the numbers seem to be in your favor. I’ll also talk about why having a lawyer on your side is essential when facing an OVI or DUI charge. If you’ve ever wondered about what the “legal limit” really means or how law enforcement handles these cases, you’ll want to listen in. Here are 3 key takeaways from the conversation: Two Ways to Be Charged: In Ohio, you can be charged with OVI either by exceeding the legal limit (‘per se’ at 0.08 BAC for adults) OR by showing signs of impairment, regardless of your BAC. Impairment Can Trump the Numbers: Even if your BAC is under 0.08, evidence such as slurred speech, poor field sobriety results, or an unsteady demeanor can still result in charges if law enforcement believes you are impaired. Legal Nuances Require Expertise: Defending an OVI charge—even with a low BAC—can be complex. Legal limitations may prevent simply using the breath test result as a defense without expert testimony. Got a question you want answered on the podcast? Call 614-859-2119 and leave us a voicemail. Steve will answer your question on the next podcast! Submit your questions to www.lawyertalkpodcast.com . Recorded at Channel 511 . Stephen E. Palmer, Esq. has been practicing criminal defense almost exclusively since 1995. He has represented people in federal, state, and local courts in Ohio and elsewhere. Though he focuses on all areas of criminal defense, he particularly enjoys complex cases in state and federal courts. He has unique experience handling and assembling top defense teams of attorneys and experts in cases involving allegations of child abuse (false sexual allegations, false physical abuse allegations), complex scientific cases involving allegations of DUI and vehicular homicide cases with blood alcohol tests, and any other criminal cases that demand jury trial experience. Steve has unique experience handling numerous high-publicity cases that have garnered national attention. For more information about Steve and his law firm, visit Palmer Legal Defense . Copyright 2025 Stephen E. Palmer - Attorney At Law Mentioned in this episode: Circle 270 Media Podcast Consultants Circle 270 Media® is a podcast consulting firm based in Columbus, Ohio, specializing in helping businesses develop, launch, and optimize podcasts as part of their marketing strategy. The firm emphasizes the importance of storytelling through podcasting to differentiate businesses and engage with their audiences effectively. www.circle270media.com…

Lawyer Talk: Off the Record

1
Can Judges Force Defendants to Explain Crimes? | Lawyer Talk Q&A 7:07

il y a 10 weeks7:07