))
$250M from Google ain’t gonna cut it: can journalists get paid? w/ Matt Pearce
Manage episode 441098365 series 3530989
Contenu fourni par Dexter Thomas. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par Dexter Thomas ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
warning: you’re about to listen to two journalists talk about the news. But the news sucks! you say — so why should we care? Well, this $250 million deal might have just made it worse. Counterintuitive, but Matt Pearce (ex LA Times) has a pretty compelling argument. We talk about this, and AI, and a bunch of other stuff.
Keep in mind that this is a pretty complicated topic, and there are some other viewpoints on this. For example, there’s this opposing stance:
And on the other hand, there's Matt summarizing the situation, where he says 'hardly anyone won, except Google':
https://mattdpearce.substack.com/p/a-deep-dive-into-googles-shady-and
And also this:
https://mindandiron.substack.com/p/mind-and-iron-gavin-newsom-may-have
There’s also Matt’s big spreadsheet on astroturfing, which we mention only briefly:
https://mattdpearce.substack.com/p/californias-sb-1327-and-the-big-tech
You can find Matt Pearce at his newsletter, which I highly recommend:
https://mattdpearce.substack.com
Anyway, this is something a lot of people probably won’t even be aware of, because it’s a really boring topic. But I think this is going to be playing out repeatedly, soon. Stay in tune.
22 episodes
Partager
