Artwork

Content provided by Prologue Projects. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Prologue Projects or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Navarette v. California

49:30
 
Share
 

Manage episode 283876403 series 2622019
Content provided by Prologue Projects. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Prologue Projects or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

219 episodes

Artwork

Navarette v. California

5-4

787 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 283876403 series 2622019
Content provided by Prologue Projects. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Prologue Projects or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://player.fm/legal.

Your hosts discuss Navarette v. California, which held that an unverified anonymous tip about reckless driving could be sufficient grounds for the police to pull over a car. The case exemplifies how deferential the Supreme Court is to police power, and has resulted in an increased reliance on anonymous tips by the cops, and a corresponding erosion of citizens’ privacy rights.


Follow Peter (@The_Law_Boy), Rhiannon (@AywaRhiannon), and Michael (@_FleerUltra) on Twitter.



Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

219 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Quick Reference Guide