Player FM - Internet Radio Done Right
6,106 subscribers
Checked 1M ago
Ajouté il y a treize ans
Contenu fourni par New York City Skeptics. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par New York City Skeptics ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Player FM - Application Podcast
Mettez-vous hors ligne avec l'application Player FM !
Mettez-vous hors ligne avec l'application Player FM !
Rationally Speaking Podcast
Tout marquer comme (non) lu
Manage series 4219
Contenu fourni par New York City Skeptics. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par New York City Skeptics ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Rationally Speaking is the bi-weekly podcast of New York City Skeptics. Join host Julia Galef and guests as they explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense, likely from unlikely, and science from pseudoscience. Any topic is fair game as long as we can bring reason to bear upon it, with both a skeptical eye and a good dose of humor! We agree with the Marquis de Condorcet, who said that in an open society we ought to devote ourselves to "the tracking down of prejudices in the hiding places where priests, the schools, the government, and all long-established institutions had gathered and protected them."Rationally Speaking was co-created with Massimo Pigliucci, is produced by Benny Pollak, and is recorded in the heart of New York City's Greenwich Village.
…
continue reading
264 episodes
Tout marquer comme (non) lu
Manage series 4219
Contenu fourni par New York City Skeptics. Tout le contenu du podcast, y compris les épisodes, les graphiques et les descriptions de podcast, est téléchargé et fourni directement par New York City Skeptics ou son partenaire de plateforme de podcast. Si vous pensez que quelqu'un utilise votre œuvre protégée sans votre autorisation, vous pouvez suivre le processus décrit ici https://fr.player.fm/legal.
Rationally Speaking is the bi-weekly podcast of New York City Skeptics. Join host Julia Galef and guests as they explore the borderlands between reason and nonsense, likely from unlikely, and science from pseudoscience. Any topic is fair game as long as we can bring reason to bear upon it, with both a skeptical eye and a good dose of humor! We agree with the Marquis de Condorcet, who said that in an open society we ought to devote ourselves to "the tracking down of prejudices in the hiding places where priests, the schools, the government, and all long-established institutions had gathered and protected them."Rationally Speaking was co-created with Massimo Pigliucci, is produced by Benny Pollak, and is recorded in the heart of New York City's Greenwich Village.
…
continue reading
264 episodes
Semua episode
×
1 Is cash the best way to help the poor? (Michael Faye) 52:13
52:13
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé52:13
The idea of giving poor people cash, no strings attached, is "very unappealing" for most donors, admits economist Michael Faye -- but it's still one of the best ways to help the poor. Michael and Julia discuss the philosophy behind his organization (GiveDirectly), the evidence we have so far about cash transfers as an anti-poverty intervention, and the various concerns people have about it: How long-lasting are the effects? Does it make recipients less likely to work? Does it cause inflation?…

1 Humanity on the precipice (Toby Ord) 1:08:54
1:08:54
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:08:54
Humanity could thrive for millions of years -- unless our future is cut short by an existential catastrophe. Oxford philosopher Toby Ord explains the possible existential risks we face, including climate change, pandemics, and artificial intelligence. Toby and Julia discuss what led him to take existential risk more seriously, which risks he considers underrated vs. overrated, and how to estimate the probability of existential risk.…

1 Dangerous biological research - is it worth it? (Kevin Esvelt) 1:07:57
1:07:57
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:07:57
Kevin Esvelt, a scientist at MIT, argues that research intended to prevent pandemics is actually putting us in a lot more danger. Also discussed: Kevin's own research on engineering wild animal species. Are the risks worth the benefits?

1 Why we're polarized (Ezra Klein) 1:18:57
1:18:57
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:18:57
Ezra Klein explains how Republican and Democrats in the US became so different from each other, ideologically and demographically, and why that trend + our institutions = political gridlock. Questions covered include: Is polarization necessarily bad? Has the left polarized more than the right? And what should we make of polls that seem to show Republicans and Democrats used to agree on immigration policy?…

1 The genetic lottery (Kathryn Paige Harden) 1:04:12
1:04:12
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:04:12
Kathryn Paige Harden, author of “The Genetic Lottery: Why DNA Matters for Social Equality” explains what scientists have learned about how our genes affect our educational success. Why is this research so controversial? And is it worth doing anyway?

1 How to reason about COVID, and other hard things (Kelsey Piper) 1:17:55
1:17:55
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:17:55
Journalist Kelsey Piper (Future Perfect / Vox) discusses lessons learned from covering COVID: What has she been wrong about, and why? How much can we trust the CDC's advice? What does the evidence look like for different drugs like Fluvoxamine and Ivermectin? And should regular people really try to evaluate the evidence themselves instead of deferring to experts?…

1 "Price gouging" in emergencies 52:08
52:08
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé52:08
Every time there’s an emergency, the prices of certain goods skyrocket -- like masks and hand sanitizer during COVID -- and the public gets angry about price gouging. In this episode, two economists (Raymond Niles and Amihai Glazer) make the case for why “price gouging” is actually a good thing, and Julia raises potential counterarguments.…

1 How to be a data detective (Tim Harford) 1:02:45
1:02:45
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:02:45
When you see a statistic reported in the news, like "10% of University of California Berkeley students were homeless this year," how do you evaluate it? You shouldn't blindly accept every statistic you read. But neither should you reject everything that sounds surprising. Tim Harford, economist and author of The Data Detective: Ten Easy Rules to Make Sense of Statistics , talks about the heuristics he recommends using, and the mistakes people tend to make.…

1 Are Uber and Lyft drivers being exploited? 1:01:51
1:01:51
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:01:51
How much do Uber and Lyft drivers really earn, after expenses? Are they getting a raw deal by being classified as 'independent contractors' instead of employees? I explore the debate over these questions with three guests: Louis Hyman (Cornell), Veena Dubal (UC Hastings College of the Law), and Harry Campbell (The Rideshare Guy).…

1 Unfair laws / Why judges should be originalists (William Baude) 1:03:17
1:03:17
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:03:17
Is there any justification for seemingly unjust laws like "qualified immunity," which allows cops to get away with bad behavior? William Baude, a leading scholar of constitutional law, explores how these laws came to be and why they're so hard to change. Also, Baude makes the case for originalism, the view that judges should base their rulings on the original meaning of the Constitution. And Baude explains how rationalist principles have influenced his teaching and legal scholarship.…

1 Intellectual honesty, cryptocurrency, & more (Vitalik Buterin) 1:16:40
1:16:40
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:16:40
Julia and guest Vitalik Buterin (creator of the open-source blockchain platform Ethereum) explore a wide range of topics, including: Vitalik's intellectually honest approach to leadership, why prediction markets appear to be biased in favor of Trump, whether it was rational to invest in Bitcoin ten years ago, Vitalik's defense of life extension research against its critics, and more.…

1 Understanding moral disagreements (Jonathan Haidt) 1:06:04
1:06:04
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:06:04
Julia and social psychologist Jonathan Haidt (The Righteous Mind) discuss his moral foundations theory and argue about whether liberals should “expand their moral horizons” by learning to think like conservatives. Julia solicits Jon’s help in understanding her disagreement with philosopher Michael Sandel, in episode 247, over the morality of consensual cannibalism.…

1 The case for one billion Americans, & more (Matt Yglesias) 1:40:49
1:40:49
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:40:49
Matt Yglesias talks about One Billion Americans, his book arguing that it’s in the United States’ national interest to dramatically boost its population, by expanding immigration and having more babies. Matt and Julia also discuss arguments for and against the “YIMBY” movement, which pushes for building more housing; what they’ve both learned from reflecting on their misguided support for the Iraq War in 2003; and why (and how) Matt is trying to be more of a rationalist.…

1 What’s wrong with tech companies banning people? (Julian Sanchez) 56:48
56:48
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé56:48
Companies like Twitter and Facebook are increasingly willing to ban users -- and even if you agree with their decisions, is it worrying that a few companies have so much power? Julia discusses with Julian Sanchez, expert on tech and civil liberties.

1 The case for racial colorblindness (Coleman Hughes) 1:10:26
1:10:26
Lire Plus Tard
Lire Plus Tard
Des listes
J'aime
Aimé1:10:26
Coleman Hughes explains why he favors a "colorblind" ideal and why the "race-conscious" camp disagrees with him. Coleman and Julia also discuss whether reparations are just, and what counts as racism.
Bienvenue sur Lecteur FM!
Lecteur FM recherche sur Internet des podcasts de haute qualité que vous pourrez apprécier dès maintenant. C'est la meilleure application de podcast et fonctionne sur Android, iPhone et le Web. Inscrivez-vous pour synchroniser les abonnements sur tous les appareils.